Inbreeding Effective Population Size Under Some Artificial Selection Schemes. II. Normal Distribution of Breeding Values
Two selection systems, truncation selection followed by a balanced mating (truncation selection) and a selection scheme that assigns mating frequencies to individuals according to their breeding values (weighting system), were compared with respect to inbreeding effective population size. This comparison was made with the condition that both selection schemes give the same expected performance of selected individuals (selection differential). Breeding values of selected individuals were assumed to be normally distributed on a performance scale. Two functions, linear and Beta, were used to represent weighting systems. The results showed that (1) depending on the distribution of breeding values, inbreeding effective population number of some weighting systems can be greater than that of a truncation selection that generates the same selection differential, and (2) because the difference in inbreeding effective population size using different systems can be substantial, it is worth examining for the presence of desirable weighting systems in practical tree breeding situations. For. Sci. 35(2):303-318.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA-Forest Service, and Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Publication date: 1989-06-01
More about this publication?
- Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)
Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Journal of Forestry
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites