Skip to main content

Analysis of Forest Fertilizer Experiments: Obtaining Better Precision and Extracting More Information

Buy Article:

$21.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Later-age forest fertilizer experiments can be quite difficult to analyze appropriately and in ways that extract all the information inherent in the collected data. Observed responses are likely to be partially confounded with variations in pretreatment stand development, most of which can be removed through analyses of covariance using quanta of initial growing stock as a covariate. Pretreatment growth rate may represent an even more discerning covariate. Rather than use covariance some authors have chosen, instead, to use arithmetical procedures to adjust treatment responses. Reanalysis of a Canadian experiment of this latter kind suggests that such methodology may be less than ideal, and should not be preferred to covariance analysis. A general and systematic procedure for examining forest nutrition experiments is proposed for those involving t treatments, and also those where the t treatments represent n factors at p levels in factorial combination. An example of adopting the recommendation methodology for the first type is given using a completely randomized experiment in naturally regenerated radiata pine in New Zealand with five replications of four treatments. Adoption of the suggested procedures in conjunction with two covariates provides a useful insight into the data, and appreciably increases precision. The system is sequential in structure, necessarily inducing some risk of erroneous hypothesis testing. Such a danger is usually minimal, however, and the suggested system, it is claimed, represents a useful method for isolating treatment and growth effects in forest fertilizer trials. For. Sci. 34(3):769-780.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Statistical analysis; covariance; experimental design; growth

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Reader in Forest Management, School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Publication date: 1988-09-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more