If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Regression models were fit relating foliage levels to height and basal area growth of 192 trees from 26 stands representing a wide range of site and stand conditions. The study confirmed that deteriorated tree conditions in prior years (often resulting from defoliation) affect current-year growth at specific foliage levels. Absolute height and basal area growth at specific foliage levels were found to be linearly related to absolute height and basal area growth before defoliation, indicating that proportional growth losses resulting from specified levels of defoliation do not vary between fast-growing and slow-growing trees. Various site, stand, and tree variables showed no effect on the relationship between foliage levels and proportional growth loss. Models that included predicted nondefoliated growth, foliage level, and preceding-year condition variables explained up to 61 and 91% of the variation in height and basal area growth (In-In transformation), respectively. For. Sci. 34(2):496-504.
Assistant Professor, School of Forestry and Wildlife Resources, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Publication date: June 1, 1988
More about this publication?
Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.