Skip to main content

Experiential Commodity Definition in Recreation Travel Cost Models

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Recent theoretical work implies that there is no theoretical difference between travel, resource (site), and experience consumer surpluses for a given individual and recreation site. At issue is whether all recreators at a given site produce and consume identical experiences, and if they do not, whether demand specification to account for differences could improve estimates of demand and consumer surplus. In a test case, three social-psychologically defined experience types with different demand equations and consumer surpluses were found. Based on this test case, specification of different experiences may not be important for estimating the total benefits foregone by site elimination, but may be important for decisions which would alter a site's experience mix or for estimating benefits of a new site with a different experience mix than existing sites. Forest Sci. 31:519-529.

Keywords: Experience types; site recreation benefits

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Principal Economist, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 240 W. Prospect, Fort Collins, CO 80526

Publication date: June 1, 1985

More about this publication?
  • Membership Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more