Skip to main content

The Response of Forest Recreationists to Clearcutting in Northern Lower Michigan: A Preliminary Report

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The behavioral and attitudinal responses of forest recreationists to clearcutting were measured on 8 quarter-townships, each 9 square miles in size. These areas had been clearcut at 4 levels of cutting intensity: all standing timber was removed from 202 acres on each of 2 control areas every year and experimental areas had 1,509, 1,469, 2,845, 2,678, 4,326, and 4,401 acres clearcut between 1972 and 1975. Recreationists using these areas were contacted in the field on sample days in 1974 and 1976. Mail questionnaires returned from 1,730 (55 percent) of these recreationists indicated that a majority (79 percent) had seen the clearcutting. Archery deer hunters and small game hunters had the most favorable attitude toward cutting while campers and canoeists were most opposed. The reported enjoyment of recreation on the areas and the change in the number of visitors to the areas were not always related to attitudes about clearcutting. A theoretical framework to explain the consistency and inconsistency of recreationists' response to clearcutting is presented. Forest Sci. 26:81-91.

Keywords: Aspen; multivariate analysis of variance; public behavior; white-tailed deer

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Biologist in Charge of the Houghton Lake Wildlife Research Station, Houghton Lake, Michigan

Publication date: 1980-03-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2015 Impact Factor: 1.702
    Ranking: 16 of 66 in forestry

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more