Skip to main content

Relative Efficiency of Two-Dimensional Systematic Sampling

Buy Article:

$29.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Relative efficiency of systematic and stratified versus simple random sampling for crown area and tree frequency estimation was evaluated on tree-crown maps of 48-acre tracts from five forest types of the Pacific Northwest. Four populations with specified spatial distribution patterns were generated from each tract through computer simulation. Exhaustive two-dimensional systematic sampling was then undertaken with ΒΌ-acre sampling units. Results indicate that relative efficiency of systematic sampling varies, depending on the variable being estimated and the spatial distribution of trees in the stand. Systematic sampling was more precise than simple random sampling for estimating both variables of interest when applied to the original forest types. It was less precise than simple random sampling when applied to uniformly spaced populations. Forest Sci. 16: 271-276.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Sampling; crown area; tree frequency

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Research Scientist, Forest Research Laboratory, Dep. of Fisheries and Forestry, Canadian Forestry Serv., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Publication date: 1970-09-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more