3-P Sampling and Some Alternatives, I
The relationship of 3-P sampling to some other forms of unequal probability sampling is given first. The true variance and an unbiased sample-based estimator for the variance of the "unadjusted estimate" are then derived. For the "adjusted estimate" there are theoretical expressions for the bias, approximations for the true variance, and a sample-based estimator of the variance. Comparisons based on repeated Monte Carlo sampling indicate that the bias of the adjusted estimate is small for these populations of trees. The true variance of the adjusted estimate is much smaller than that of the unadjusted estimate. But the approximations for the true variance and the sample-based estimator of variance for the adjusted estimate appear somewhat unreliable. For the true variance the best approximation is based on successive modifications of the ordinary formula for p.p.s. sampling with replacement and fixed sample size. Numerical results contrast the unconditional and conditional properties (bias and variance) of the 3-P estimates, illustrate the variability of sample size and the consequent difficulty of planning such a survey, and provide data for planning 3-P sampling in populations like these. Logical considerations indicate that 3-P sampling should be more fully compared with alternative selection rules and estimators that may use concomitant information more effectively in certain circumstances. Some alternative methods for obtaining appropriate probability samples and a numerical investigation of their properties are to be reported in part II, a sequel to this paper.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Journal Article
Affiliations: Professor of Forestry, Iowa State Univ., Ames.
Publication date: 1968-12-01
More about this publication?
- Important Notice: SAF's journals are now published through partnership with the Oxford University Press. Access to archived material will be available here on the Ingenta website until March 31, 2018. For new material, please access the journals via OUP's website. Note that access via Ingenta will be permanently discontinued after March 31, 2018. Members requiring support to access SAF's journals via OUP's site should contact SAF's membership department for assistance.
Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)
Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017
Also published by SAF:
Journal of Forestry
Other SAF Publications
- Submit a Paper
- Membership Information
- Author Guidelines
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites