Skip to main content

Scheduling Douglas-Fir Reforestation Investments: A Comparison of Methods

Buy Article:

$21.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Three alternative methods of scheduling Douglas-fir reforestation projects on the Bureau of Land Management's Roseburg District in western Oregon are described and compared. The methods are: (1) linear programming; (2) capital budgeting; and (3) certain rules-of-thumb based on professional experience and judgment. Using 1966 data, each method was employed to plan an optimal reforestation program. Net present values of the resulting programs were then compared. Linear programming provided a superior solution to the planning problem studied: Value of the linear program was 12.0 percent greater than the program obtained with capital budgeting criteria, and 16.9 percent greater than the program based on rules-of-thumb. The results demonstrate the importance of selecting the correct economic model in making investment decisions and illustrate the advantages of linear programming in analyzing complex problems involving multiple resource constraints.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Journal Article

Affiliations: Formerly graduate student and research assistant at the University of California

Publication date: 1968-12-01

More about this publication?
  • Forest Science is a peer-reviewed journal publishing fundamental and applied research that explores all aspects of natural and social sciences as they apply to the function and management of the forested ecosystems of the world. Topics include silviculture, forest management, biometrics, economics, entomology & pathology, fire & fuels management, forest ecology, genetics & tree improvement, geospatial technologies, harvesting & utilization, landscape ecology, operations research, forest policy, physiology, recreation, social sciences, soils & hydrology, and wildlife management.
    Forest Science is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.

    2016 Impact Factor: 1.782 (Rank 17/64 in forestry)

    Average time from submission to first decision: 62.5 days*
    June 1, 2016 to Feb. 28, 2017

    Also published by SAF:
    Journal of Forestry
    Other SAF Publications
  • Submit a Paper
  • Membership Information
  • Author Guidelines
  • Podcasts
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more