Author: Abrahms, Max

Source: Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Volume 29, Number 5, July-August 2006 , pp. 509-529(21)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract:

Terrorism scholars are divided over whether terrorism is an effective tactic. Disagreement derives from the fact that the objectives of terrorist groups are often highly contested. Nowhere is this clearer than in contemporary statements on Al Qaeda. This article explores the most common interpretations for why Al Qaeda attacked the United States on 11 September 2001, and then analyzes their empirical support. After determining the most compelling interpretation of Al Qaeda's objectives, the article evaluates Al Qaeda's success in achieving them since perpetrating this watershed attack. The following analysis provides a timely case study in the classic debate over whether terrorism is strategically rational behavior.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10576100600698527

Affiliations: 1: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Publication date: 2006-07-01

More about this publication?

• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Political Science ,  Sociology
• By this author: Abrahms, Max

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers