Skip to main content

Postmodern Personas in Combat: The NAACP and the Reverend Benjamin Chavis

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

This paper examines the organizational conflict that arose within the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) following the appointment of Benjamin Chavis as executive director. A rhetorical analysis of public statements issued by both Chavis and executive board members identifies two opposing corporate personas - the Traditional and the Grassroots - that competed in the struggle to define the NAACP's image and message. This analysis suggests that the Traditional and Grassroots personas were symbolic of a common organizational struggle in postmodernism - the effort to establish a unifying, beneficial image for the NAACP.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: LEADERSHIP NAACP ORGANIZATIONAL RHETORIC POSTMODERN RHETORIC

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 1999-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more