Should We Laugh or Should We Cry? John Callahan's Humor as a Tool to Change Societal Attitudes Toward Disability

In this: publication
By this: publisher
In this Subject: <a title="Language & Linguistics" href="/content/subcat?j_subject=222&j_availability=">Language & Linguistics
By this author: Shultz K. ;&nbsp; Germeroth D.

Authors: Shultz K.; Germeroth D.

Source: Howard Journal Of Communications, Volume 9, Number 3, 1 July 1998 , pp. 229-244(16)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

While cartoon scholarship in the communication discipline seeks to uncover the persuasive functions and semiotic techniques of cartoons , the discipline has predominantly looked at editorial cartoons and largely neglected the area of gag cartoons . Gag cartoons , as a particular genre of humor , provide a unique form of public argument . Drawing from the rhetorical theories of Stephen Toulmin on practical reasoning ( 1958 ) and of Kenneth Burke on perspective by incongruity ( 1959 ), this article provides a rhetorical analysis of the activist humor of quadriplegic cartoonist John Callahan . Specifically , the article seeks to demonstrate how Callahan ' s cartoons contribute to the ongoing struggle over the construction of disability in American culture .

Keywords: DISABILITY; CARTOONS; STEPHEN; TOULMIN; KENNETH; BURKE; PRACTICAL; REASONING; PERSPECTIVE; BY; INCONGRUITY; JOHN; CALLAHAN; GAG; CARTOONS; TRANSFORMATIONAL; RHETORIC