Skip to main content

Should We Laugh or Should We Cry? John Callahan's Humor as a Tool to Change Societal Attitudes Toward Disability

Buy Article:

$47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

While cartoon scholarship in the communication discipline seeks to uncover the persuasive functions and semiotic techniques of cartoons , the discipline has predominantly looked at editorial cartoons and largely neglected the area of gag cartoons . Gag cartoons , as a particular genre of humor , provide a unique form of public argument . Drawing from the rhetorical theories of Stephen Toulmin on practical reasoning ( 1958 ) and of Kenneth Burke on perspective by incongruity ( 1959 ), this article provides a rhetorical analysis of the activist humor of quadriplegic cartoonist John Callahan . Specifically , the article seeks to demonstrate how Callahan ' s cartoons contribute to the ongoing struggle over the construction of disability in American culture .
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: CARTOONS; DISABILITY; GAG CARTOONS; JOHN CALLAHAN; KENNETH BURKE; PERSPECTIVE BY INCONGRUITY; PRACTICAL REASONING; STEPHEN TOULMIN; TRANSFORMATIONAL RHETORIC

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 1998-07-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more