@article {Ortúzar:2011:0144-1647:293,
title = "Continuous Mobility Surveys: The State of Practice",
journal = "Transport Reviews",
parent_itemid = "infobike://routledg/ttrv",
publishercode ="routledg",
year = "2011",
volume = "31",
number = "3",
publication date ="2011-05-01T00:00:00",
pages = "293-312",
itemtype = "ARTICLE",
issn = "0144-1647",
eissn = "1464-5327",
url = "https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/ttrv/2011/00000031/00000003/art00002",
doi = "doi:10.1080/01441647.2010.510224",
author = "Ort{\’u}zar, Juan De Dios and Armoogum, Jimmy and Madre, JeanLoup and Potier, Fran{\c{c}}oise",
abstract = "In this paper we challenge the prevailing practice of conducting oneoff crosssectional mobility surveys, making a case for change on the basis of usefulness and costeffectiveness. We believe that urban areas over say, one million inhabitants, should collect mobility
data on a continuous basis as part of their efforts to guarantee sustainable development. This would allow them to gain a proper understanding of the pressing environmental and transportrelated issues of todays world, as well as of the effects of economic growth and price (especially
for fuel) volatility. In our scope we include panel data (i.e. information from a smaller sample of respondents who are interviewed at different points in time, hopefully during several years), as this type of information is unique in its ability to help understanding behavioural changes and
the impact of timerelated effects, such as habit and inertia. We revise the state of affairs in different parts of the world, not limiting ourselves to urban data.",
}