Author: Pearson, Geoff

Source: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Volume 12, Number 3, July 2009 , pp. 243-255(13)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract:

This article focuses on the problems faced by researchers carrying out participant observation in fields where the committal of criminal offences is the norm. Can participation in criminal activity by a researcher be justified on the grounds that it is necessary to prevent the distortion of the field? Alternatively, can the difficulties in gaining and maintaining access in such spheres excuse such conduct? The article considers the current guidance given to researchers in the social sciences and the peculiar pressures placed on them when carrying out fieldwork in 'criminal' areas. Examples from the author's own experiences carrying out covert participant observation within crowds of 'risk' football supporters are used to illustrate that in such fields the committal of offences can be unavoidable and that further guidance - but not regulation - is required to protect academics carrying out this type of research.

Keywords: ethics; participant observation; criminality; football hooliganism

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645570701804250

Affiliations: 1: Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Publication date: 2009-07-01

More about this publication?

• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Neurology & Psychiatry ,  Sociology
• By this author: Pearson, Geoff

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers