The Challenges of Conceptualizing Terrorism

Authors: LEONARD WEINBERG1; AMI PEDAHZUR2; SIVAN HIRSCH-HOEFLER3

Source: Terrorism and Political Violence, Volume 16, Number 4, October–December 2004 , pp. 777-794(18)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This analysis begins by exploring various reasons that the concept of terrorism has evaded a widely agreed upon definition for so long despite the efforts of so many writers. Emphasis is placed on the difficulties associated with all“essentially contested concepts.”In addition, the investigation calls attention to such problems as conceptual“stretching”and“traveling.”In an effort to solve the difficulties, the inquiry attempts to determine a consensus definition of terrorism by turning to an empirical analysis of how the term has been employed by academics over the years. Specifically, the well-known definition developed by Alex Schmid, based upon responses to a questionnaire he circulated in 1985, is compared with the way the concept has been employed by contributors to the major journals in the field:Terrorism, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, andTerrorism and Political Violence. The 22“definitional elements”of which Schmid's definition is composed are compared to the frequency with which they appear in the professional journals. If these elements appear frequently in both the Schmid definition and those employed by the journal contributors, they are then used to form a consensus definition of the concept. The most striking feature of this academic consensus over the meaning of terrorism is the virtual absence of references to the psychological element, heretofore widely thought to be at the heart of the concept.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1080/095465590899768

Affiliations: 1: Department of Political Science, University of Nevada Reno, Nevada, USA 2: Department of Political Science, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel 3: Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.49 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A