The Challenges of Conceptualizing Terrorism
Authors: LEONARD WEINBERG1; AMI PEDAHZUR2; SIVAN HIRSCH-HOEFLER3
Source: Terrorism and Political Violence, Volume 16, Number 4, October–December 2004 , pp. 777-794(18)
Abstract:
This analysis begins by exploring various reasons that the concept of terrorism has evaded a widely agreed upon definition for so long despite the efforts of so many writers. Emphasis is placed on the difficulties associated with allessentially contested concepts.In addition, the investigation calls attention to such problems as conceptualstretchingandtraveling.In an effort to solve the difficulties, the inquiry attempts to determine a consensus definition of terrorism by turning to an empirical analysis of how the term has been employed by academics over the years. Specifically, the well-known definition developed by Alex Schmid, based upon responses to a questionnaire he circulated in 1985, is compared with the way the concept has been employed by contributors to the major journals in the field:Terrorism, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, andTerrorism and Political Violence. The 22definitional elementsof which Schmid's definition is composed are compared to the frequency with which they appear in the professional journals. If these elements appear frequently in both the Schmid definition and those employed by the journal contributors, they are then used to form a consensus definition of the concept. The most striking feature of this academic consensus over the meaning of terrorism is the virtual absence of references to the psychological element, heretofore widely thought to be at the heart of the concept.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1080/095465590899768
Affiliations: 1: Department of Political Science, University of Nevada Reno, Nevada, USA 2: Department of Political Science, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel 3: Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Click here for Page Help