Skip to main content

There Is No Adequate Definition of ‘Fine-tuned for Life’

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The discovery that the universe is fine-tuned for life – a discovery to which the phrase ‘the anthropic principle’ is often applied – has prompted much extra-cosmic speculation by philosophers, theologians, and theoretical physicists. Such speculation is referred to as extra-cosmic because an inference is made to the existence either of one unobservable entity that is distinct from the cosmos and any of its parts (God) or of many such entities (multiple universes). In this article a case is mounted for the sceptical position that cosmic fine-tuning does not support an inference to anything extra-cosmic. To that end three definitions of ‘fine-tuned for life’ are proposed: the ‘slight difference’ definition, the (unconditional) probability definition, and John Leslie’s conditional probability definition. These three definitions are the only ones suggested by the relevant literature on fine-tuning and the anthropic principle. Since on none of them do claims of fine-tuning warrant an inference to something extracosmic, it is concluded that there is no definition of ‘fine-tuned for life’ serving this function.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/002017400414890

Publication date: 2000-09-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more