Internet-Based Treatment for Panic Disorder: Does Frequency of Therapist Contact Make a Difference?

Authors: Klein, Britt1; Austin, David1; Pier, Ciaran2; Kiropoulos, Litza3; Shandley, Kerrie1; Mitchell, Joanna3; Gilson, Kathryn3; Ciechomski, Lisa3

Source: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Volume 38, Number 2, June 2009 , pp. 100-113(14)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Internet-based interventions with therapist support have proven effective for treating a range of mental health conditions. This study examined whether frequency of therapist contact affected treatment outcomes. Fifty-seven people with panic disorder (including 32 with agoraphobia) were randomly allocated to an 8-week Internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment intervention (Panic Online) with either frequent (three e-mails per week) or infrequent (one e-mail per week) support from a psychologist. Posttreatment, intention-to-treat analyses revealed that both treatments were effective at improving panic disorder and agoraphobia severity ratings, panic-related cognitions, negative affect, and psychological and physical quality of life domains, with no differences between conditions. High end-state functioning was achieved by 28.6% of the frequent and infrequent participants, respectively. Therapist alliance, treatment credibility, and satisfaction also did not differ between groups, despite significantly greater therapist time invested in the frequent contact condition. The results provide evidence that the effectiveness of Internet-based mental health interventions may be independent of the frequency of therapist support and may, therefore, be more cost-effective than previously reported.

Keywords: Internet intervention; panic disorder; therapist-assisted; CBT treatment; randomised controlled trial (RCT)

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506070802561132

Affiliations: 1: Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University, Victoria 2: School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria 3: Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

Publication date: 2009-06-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page