Computer-Aided Psychotherapy for Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analytic Review

Authors: Cuijpers, Pim1; Marks, Isaac2; van Straten, Annemieke1; Cavanagh, Kate3; Gega, Lina4; Andersson, Gerhard5

Source: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Volume 38, Number 2, June 2009 , pp. 66-82(17)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Computer-aided psychotherapy (CP) is said to (1) be as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy, while requiring less therapist time, for anxiety disorder sufferers, (2) speed access to care, and (3) save traveling time. CP may be delivered on stand-alone or Internet-linked computers, palmtop computers, phone-interactive voice response, DVDs, and cell phones. The authors performed a meta-analysis of 23 randomised controlled studies (RCTs) that compared CP with non-CP in anxiety disorders: phobias, n = 10; panic disorder/agoraphobia, n = 9; PTSD, n = 3; obsessive-compulsive disorder, n = 1. Overall mean effect size of CP compared with non-CP was 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.32). CP and face-to-face psychotherapy did not differ significantly from each other (13 comparisons, d = -0.06). Much caution is needed when interpreting the findings indicating that outcome was unrelated to type of disorder, type of comparison group, mode of CP delivery (Internet, stand-alone PC, palmtop), and recency of the CP system and that effect size decreased when more therapist time was replaced by the computer. Because CP as a whole was as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy, certain forms of CP deserve to be integrated into routine practice.

Keywords: Computer-aided psychotherapy; anxiety disorders; Internet therapy; meta-analysis

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506070802694776

Affiliations: 1: Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2: Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London 3: School of Psychology, University of Newcastle and Northumberland, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK 4: School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 5: Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linkoping University, Linkoping,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychiatry Section, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Publication date: 2009-06-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page