Skeletal analysis and theoretical complications
Archaeologists – feminist or otherwise – use biologically sexed human remains to make inferences about cultures' conceptions of gender. Creating an easy link between ‘sex' and ‘gender', however, is not without problems. Recent debates within the social sciences have centered on the evolving, historical definition and cultural relevance of both of these terms. Interestingly, skeletal analysts' voices tend to remain silent in this debate. What do paradigmatic twists and turns in feminist and queer theorizing mean for burial analysis? To answer this question, I advocate a bioarchaeological approach that facilitates reconciliation of biological classifications, cultural constructions of gender and feminist theories that complicate ‘sex' and ‘gender'. As an example, I look to the pre-Columbian Maya.
Keywords: Bioarchaeology; feminist and queer theories; gender/sex; performance; pre-Columbian Maya
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: American University, Department of Anthropology, Battelle-Tompkins, T-27, 4400 Massachusetts Ave, Washington, DC, NW, 20016
Publication date: 01 December 2005
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content