Skip to main content

Third party liability for child abuse: unanswered questions

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

In recent years, Tort litigation in respect of child abuse has moved towards the increased imposition of third party liability. This trend has been enhanced by the House of Lords decision in Lister v. Hesley Hall which reconsidered the 'Salmond criteria' for vicarious liability for intentional torts in the light of jurisprudence from the Supreme Court of Canada. In English courts, judicial reasoning in this area has been driven predominantly by legal principle rather than by policy considerations. Until the latter are articulated, the reality behind, and the implications for practice of, the trend towards third party liability for child abuse cannot be fully understood.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: child abuse; close connection; policy; secondary defendants; vicarious liability

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Law, Oxford Brookes University

Publication date: 2003-02-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more