When should expenditure per life saved vary?

Author: Ramsberg J.

Source: Journal of Risk Research, Volume 5, Number 3, 1 July 2002 , pp. 249-263(15)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $49.55 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Huge variations in expenditure per life saved have been documented in the USA, Sweden, and Japan. Using an original-position argument, this paper examines normative rationales that might permit departures from equalization of marginal lifesaving investments. The conclusion is that adjustment for identifiability, as reflected in strict benefit-cost analysis, is not justified yet adjustments for consideration of longevity, quality of life and productivity are compelling. It is less clear as to whether factors such as ability to pay, voluntariness and catastrophic potential should influence lifesaving expenditures.

Keywords: COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RAWLSIAN VEIL OF IGNORANCE; VALUE OF LIFE

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2002-07-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page