Celebrating the centenaries of Sir John Summerson and Henry-Russell Hitchcock: finding a historiography for the architect-historian

Author: Lipstadt, Hélène1

Source: The Journal of Architecture, Volume 10, Number 1, February 2005 , pp. 43-61(19)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Just as the ‘great makers' of twentieth century architecture were said to be four in number, so it has been said that the historian ‘makers' were also four: Reyner Banham, Henry-Russell Hitchcock, Sir Nikolaus Pevsner, and Sir John Summerson.1 The greatness of Hitchcock (1903–1987) and Summerson (1904–1992) was the premise for a June 2004 symposium entitled Sir John Summerson and Henry-Russell Hitchcock: A Centenary Conference on Aspects of Architectural Historiography in the Twentieth Century . According to the symposium organisers, they were ‘two of the greatest architectural historians writing in English in the century in which the discipline itself emerged and became established'. The symposium's distinguished double sponsorship by The Paul Mellon Center for Studies in British Art and the Society of Architectural Historians (USA), and its inclusion in a series of planned collaborations between the American organisation and its sister foreign institutions, made the case ipso facto that their stature as great historians remains largely intact across the hyphen that joins Anglo-American history of architecture. In the light of the abundance of revisionist challenges to those reputations, the premise was indeed a bold one.2 As we shall see, despite much new research, many new findings, and engaged (and, given the circumstances), courageously honest and collaborative discussion, on balance, the two central figures eluded comprehension. Diametrically opposing views were left standing, with neither one side nor the other carrying the analytical day. This ‘critical stalemate, to use a Summersonian term,3 can arguably be used to develop an historiography of the architect-historian that is of general methodological pertinence and of special relevance for today's architect-intellectual.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1080/13602360500063428

Affiliations: 1: MIT School of Architecture and Planning, Cambridge, MA, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$29.87 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A