Skip to main content

Modular A-levels – who are the winners and losers? A comparison of lower-sixth and upper-sixth students' performance in linear and modular A-level physics examinations

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

With the growth of modular assessment at A-level and the proposed introduction of the Advanced Subsidiary level, students, teachers and those responsible for standards in examinations must assess the impact of a number of factors on performance. This study focuses on the effects of maturity and gender, and highlights their possible influence on performance at A-level. The study compares the performance of two groups of students, using data gathered from the examination scripts of lower-sixth and upper-sixth candidates in A-level physics. The candidates were assessed while at different stages in their course, using the same examination questions. Pupils completing the second year of the course had a higher level of attainment than those taking the examination during the first year of study. Similar differences between upper-sixth and lower-sixth pupils were observed in both boys and girls; however, there is some evidence which may suggest that boys are more likely than girls to take advantage of some of the features of modular examinations.

Keywords: A-LEVEL; ASSESSMENT; GENDER; MATURITY; MODULAR; SCIENCE

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880010021302

Publication date: 2001-02-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more