Skip to main content

Laughter, Judgment and Democratic Politics

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This essay traces a line of thought from Kant's phenomenology of laughter in Critique of Judgment through Hannah Arendt's appropriation and modification of Kantian reflective judgment in order to explore how laughter may inform a mode and style of political judgment I call the politics of laughter. I argue that laughter is a pleasurable affective response to the contingency of experience, an affect which can infuse political judgment and open the possibility of a more affirmative democratic politics. The last section of the essay imagines a series of conversations emerging from a viewing of the movie Borat in order to show what issues would be raised, and in what tone conversation would proceed, in a politics of laughter.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735780802696328

Publication date: 2009-04-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more