Skip to main content

An analysis of irrigated agricultural outcomes under the prior appropriation doctrine: hypotheses and applications

Buy Article:

$53.17 plus tax (Refund Policy)


This article measures irrigated agricultural outcomes under the prior appropriation doctrine by developing a model of farmers’ land allocations in response to water supply change. The modelling approach considers the institutional factors of water rights and permits the inclusive determination of water and land allocations. We utilize farm-level data of irrigated agriculture in Water District #1 in Idaho to examine the predictions from our theoretical model. The water rights priority date is consolidated at the farm level and used to differentiate farmers’ responses. We test a set of hypotheses that relate to water supply and crop revenue. Our results suggest that the water rights priority has a profound impact on agricultural outcomes, indicating strong institutional effects and weak influence of market-based approaches. Farmers respond to both long-term and seasonal water supply change and variation, and they respond to seasonal water supply forecasts in varied ways depending on their water rights portfolios, thus signalling a disproportionate distribution of potential impacts of water supply change.

Keywords: P48; Q12; Q15; Q18; agricultural outcomes; irrigated agriculture; water rights priority; water supplies

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: 1: Department of Economics, Boise State University, Boise, ID, 83725, USA 2: Department of Mathematics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA

Publication date: August 3, 2014

More about this publication?

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more