Skip to main content

The effects of tax convexity on default and investment decisions

Buy Article:

$53.17 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The objective of this article is to examine how default and investment triggers change under different levels of tax asymmetry when firms face nonlinear tax schedules. Under a convex tax schedule, profits are taxed at a higher rate, while losses are taxed (or rebated) at a lower rate, thus reducing the risk shared by the government. This article presents a dynamic model based on the contingent-claims framework to explore the impacts of tax convexity on the triggers, and we find that the impacts vary significantly depending on several countervailing forces. Tax convexity has a nonmonotonic relationship with both the default and investment triggers, because of the government’s risk-sharing role. The default trigger is higher when tax convexity increases, while the growth option exerts a counteracting effect that lowers this trigger, creating an ambiguity in the investment trigger when changing the level of tax asymmetry.

Keywords: G30; contingent-claims model; default option; growth option; investment option; tax convexity

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: 1: Department of Finance and Business Economics, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau, China 2: Department of Finance and Insurance, Faculty of Business, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China

Publication date: April 13, 2014

More about this publication?

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more