Skip to main content

An extension of the Tiebout hypothesis of voting with one’s feet: the Medicaid magnet hypothesis

Buy Article:

$47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

This study empirically extends the Tiebout hypothesis of ‘voting with one’s feet’ in two ways. First, it provides updated estimates using net migration data for the period 2000–2008. Second, in addition to investigating variables reflecting public education outlays, property taxation and income taxation, it investigates whether migrants are attracted to states with higher Medicaid benefits per recipient. The latter hypothesis is referred to as the ‘Medicaid magnet hypothesis’. The analysis includes three economic variables, three quality of life variables and three Tiebout-type factors in addition to Medicaid benefits. Results indicate that consumer voters were attracted to states with higher per pupil public school spending, lower property and income tax rates, and that certain consumer-voters may be attracted to states that offer higher levels of Medicaid benefits.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: D72; D79; H71; H72; Medicaid magnet hypothesis; R23; Tiebout hypothesis; migration

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Walker/Wells Fargo Endowed Chair in Finance, Davis College of Business, Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, FL, 32211, USA 2: Probasco Chair of Free Enterprise, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, 37403–2598, USA

Publication date: 2013-11-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more