Productivity and financial support in academic bioscience
Despite widespread awareness that scientific record and grant funding reinforce one another, empirical models of scientific production normally consider laboratory inputs to be exogenous. The present article employs a cross-section of academic bioscientists to examine the mutual relationship
between research output and financial support. Information's nonrival character is such that scientific output and funding success cannot be expressed in strictly supply-and-demand terms. We find the typical bioscience laboratory to operate in a range of decreasing returns to scale and to
over-invest in laboratory equipment and materials. Publication and funding success strongly reinforce one another, explaining the right-skewed success distributions often observed in science.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
Document Type: Research Article
National Council of Applied Economic Research, 11 Indraprastha EstateNew Delhi 110002, India
Risk Capital and Portfolio Analysis, Bank of America, 315 Montgomery St., 12th FloorSan Francisco,CA 94104-1866, USA
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,Oregon State University, Corvallis,OR 97331, USA
Departments of Economics and Environmental Management,Portland State University, 241M Cramer HallPortland,OR 97207-0751, USA
Publication date: 01 July 2013
More about this publication?