Skip to main content

Objective tests, learning to learn and learning styles: a comment

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Given the growing interest concerning the use of alternative assessment methods in accounting education, Sangster's recent paper in this journal is to be welcomed (June, 1996). Sangster presents evidence of his use of objective testing (OT) in a second-level course over five years, comparing performance and the background characteristics of students (including learning styles) in two of those years, and finds learning styles have an impact upon performance. The paper presents an interesting and topical account of the use of OTs in an accounting course over an extended period. However, his applied use of learning styles and the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) in this context is methodologically questionable. This comment indicates how future research might build on his exploratory work. Issues of concern include the literature base, the psychometric properties of the LSQ, analysis and disclosure of results and educational implications.

Keywords: LEARNING STYLES; OBJECTIVE TEST; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/096392898331117

Publication date: 1998-12-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more