Skip to main content

Minimization and maximization techniques: assessing the perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Identifying interrogation strategies that minimize the likelihood of obtaining false information, without compromising the ability to elicit true information, is a challenge faced by both law enforcement and scientists. Previous research suggests that minimization and maximization techniques may be perceived by a suspect as an expectation of leniency and a threat of harsher punishment, respectively, and that these approaches may be associated with false confessions. The current studies examine whether it is possible to distinguish between minimization and maximization techniques that do or do not influence a suspect's perceptions of the consequences of confessing. Results indicate that techniques that manipulate the perceived consequences of confessing influence both the decision to confess and the diagnostic value of confession evidence.

Keywords: confession; interrogation; interviewing; police interviewing techniques; social perception

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.561801

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology,University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso,Texas, USA 2: Roger Williams University, Bristol,Rhode Island, USA

Publication date: 2012-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more