The effects of different paraphrasing styles on the quality of reports from young child witnesses
Authors: Evans, Angela1; Roberts, Kim2
Source: Psychology, Crime and Law, Volume 15, Number 6, July 2009 , pp. 531-546(16)
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
Young children's descriptions of sexual abuse are often sparse thus creating the need for techniques that elicit lengthier accounts. 'Paraphrasing', or repeating information children have just disclosed, is a technique sometimes used by forensic interviewers to clarify or elicit information (e.g. if a child stated 'He touched me', an interviewer could respond 'He touched you?'). However, the effects of paraphrasing have yet to be scientifically assessed. The impact of different paraphrasing styles on young children's reports was investigated. Overall, paraphrasing per se did not improve the length, richness, or accuracy of reports when compared to open-ended prompts such as 'tell me more', but some styles of paraphrasing were more beneficial than others. The results provide clear recommendations for investigative interviewers about how to use paraphrasing appropriately, and which practices can compromise the quality of children's reports.Keywords: child eyewitness; child witness; children's memory; interviewing; investigative
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1080/10683160802385398
Affiliations: 1: University of Toronto, Institute of Child Study, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2: Wilfrid Laurier University, Psychology, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Click here for Page Help