Skip to main content

The roles of interrogation, perception, and individual differences in producing compliant false confessions

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This study utilized an experimental design to examine the amount of variance in false confessions that was explained by three types of variables. These variable sets were interrogation tactics, perceptions, and individual differences. The results indicated that interrogation tactics alone explained only a trivial amount of variance; whereas perceptions and individual differences each explained significant amounts of the variance in false confessions. The individual difference measure called interrogative compliance was found to be particularly important in explaining false confessions. Implications for theory are discussed.

Keywords: Interrogation; false confession; false evidence; min/max statements

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600632801

Affiliations: The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA

Publication date: 2007-04-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more