Skip to main content

False confessions in the lab: Do plausibility and consequences matter?

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The present paper describes three studies that examined false confessions in the laboratory. Studies 1 ( N =56) and 2 ( N =9) relied on the by now classic computer crash paradigm introduced by Kassin and Kiechel ( Psychological Science , 7 , 125–128, 1996). Study 3 ( N =12) employed a novel paradigm in which undergraduate participants were falsely accused of exam fraud. Our data indicate that false confessions do occur, even when conditions become more ecologically valid. Furthermore, we explored whether individual differences in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures are related to false confessions. Of these, only fantasy proneness was associated with false confessions.

Keywords: False confessions; fantasy proneness; individual differences

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: Department of Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Publication date: 2006-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more