Skip to main content

The Making of the Law Prohibiting 'Cruel and Unusual' Punishment in Prisons: Using Autopoietic Theory to Reconstruct the Eighth Amendment

Buy Article:

$47.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Autopoietic theory can be used to explain the federal judiciary's making of the Eighth Amendment law prohibiting 'cruel and unusual' punishment in the nations prisons. This paper argues that the legal system operated autopoietically in the making of the Eighth Amendment prison law in that, beginning as a closed system, the legal system opened up to make the prison law, and returned to a closed system once the lawmaking process was completed. In the final analysis, the paper argues that by understanding how the federal courts have operated, it may give indications on its future behavior and how Eighth Amendment cases will ultimately be decided.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Communications; Deliberate Undifference; Federal Courts; Legal Norms; Socially Diffused Laws; Systems

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 June 2004

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more