IngentaConnect MEDIA ATTRIBUTIONS OF BLAME AND SYMPATHY IN TEN RAPE CASES

Authors: ARDOVINI-BROOKER J.¹; CARINGELLA-MACDONALD S.²

Source: The Justice Professional, Volume 15, Number 1, 1 January 2002 , pp. 3-18(16)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract:

This study builds upon previous research investigating the nature of magazine coverage of rape cases between 1980 and 1996. The previous research examined the low versus high visibility cases vis-a`-vis case characteristics. The present examination explores condemnation in rape cases in light of case characteristics. A total of 123 articles have been compiled from national magazines. Ten rape cases are included in this study. Concerns pivot around media attribution of rape culpability. The research questions whether the victim's/offender's race and/or class affects the media's exculpation or vilification of the rape victim and/or offender. In other words, the study investigates whether there is a perpetuation of the victim blaming ideology by the media as it pertains to certain rape cases. The research goes on to explore whether the rape scenario, e.g. stranger, acquaintance, single offender or multiple offenders impacts media attributions in rape cases. The findings of this content analysis are viewed in the context of the backlash against feminism and the 'feminist' rape reform movement. It is important to understand the phenomena of beliefs about rape in the present era of the backlash that continues to erode gains of the feminist and the rape reform movements.

Keywords: Rape; Rape reform; Rape myths; Media; Victim blame; Violence against women; Popular culture

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Sam Houston State University, Dept. of Sociology, P.O. Box 2446, Huntsville, TX 77341-2446 2: Western Michigan University, Dept. of Sociology, Kalamazoo, MI 49008

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.34 plus tax