Improving the Performance of the Education Sector: The Valuable, Challenging, and Limited Role of Random Assignment Evaluations

$53.29 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

In an attempt to improve the quality of educational research, the US Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences has provided funding for 65 randomized controlled trials of educational interventions. We argue that this research methodology is more effective in providing guidance to extremely troubled schools about how to make some progress than guidance to schools trying to move from making some progress to becoming high-performance organizations. We also argue that the conventional view of medical research - discoveries made in specialized laboratories that are then tested using randomized control trials - is an inaccurate description of the sources of advances in medical practice. Moreover, this conventional view of the sources of advances in medical practice leads to incorrect inferences about how to improve educational research. We illustrate this argument using evidence from the history of medical research on the treatment of cystic fibrosis.

Keywords: Education; Medicine; Randomized controlled trials; Research and development

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438590600982236

Affiliations: 1: Harvard Graduate School of Education and National Bureau of Economic Research, USA 2: Columbia University, USA

Publication date: July 1, 2007

More about this publication?
Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more