@article {Chang:2009:1024-2694:149,
title = "RAISING THE COST OF REBELLION: THE ROLE OF THIRD-PARTY INTERVENTION IN INTRASTATE CONFLICT",
journal = "Defence and Peace Economics",
parent_itemid = "infobike://routledg/gdpe",
publishercode ="routledg",
year = "2009",
volume = "20",
number = "3",
publication date ="2009-06-01T00:00:00",
pages = "149-169",
itemtype = "ARTICLE",
issn = "1024-2694",
eissn = "1476-8267",
url = "https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/gdpe/2009/00000020/00000003/art00001",
doi = "doi:10.1080/10242690802221742",
keyword = "Peace, Intrastate conflict, Third-party intervention, War",
author = "Chang, Yang-Ming and Sanders, Shane",
abstract = "This paper presents a simple model to characterize explicitly the role that an intervening third party plays in raising the cost of rebellion in an intrastate conflict. Extending the Gershenson-Grossman (2000) framework of conflict in a two-stage game to the case involving outside intervention in a three-stage game as in Chang et al. (2007b), we examine the conditions under which an outside party optimally intervenes such that (i) the strength of the rebel group is diminished or (ii) the rebellion is deterred altogether. We also find conditions in which a third party optimally intervenes but at a level insufficient to deter rebellion. Such behavior, which improves the incumbent government's potential to succeed in conflict, is overlooked in some conflict studies evaluating the effectiveness of intervention. One policy implication of the model is that an increase in the strength of inter-governmental trade partnerships increases the likelihood that third-party intervention deters rebellion.",
}