Negotiated Settlements and Government Strategy in Civil War: Evidence from Darfur
Author: Johnston, Patrick
Source: Civil Wars, Volume 9, Number 4, December 2007 , pp. 359-377(19)
Abstract:
This article examines how governments can use peace processes to advance their political interests and improve their prospects for future counterinsurgency operations. It argues that governments devise strategies to co-opt rebel factions in negotiated settlements, conditional on their support in counterinsurgency and intelligence provision against non-signatory factions. By dividing and weakening non-signatory factions, this strategy allows governments simultaneously to preserve their international reputation by cooperating in peace processes and to enhance their relative capabilities in future rounds of counterinsurgency. A detailed case study of the Sudanese government's strategy in the Darfur civil war demonstrates the argument's plausibility.Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698240701699466
Publication date: 2007-12-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- By this author: Johnston, Patrick

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert