Humanitarian mine action and peace building: exploring the relationship
Authors: Harpviken, Kristian Berg1; Ska˚ra, Bernt A1
Source: Third World Quarterly, Volume 24, Number 5, October 2003 , pp. 809-822(14)
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
Focusing on the humanitarian mine action (hma) sector, this article argues that rooting peace building in concrete activities carries considerable promise, diversifying the repertoire and enhancing the robustness of peace building. However, the assumption that mine action necessarily contributes to building peace is problematic and permits the neglect of harmful effects and a failure to capitalise fully on the potential for positive ones. If peace building is seen in terms of three major domains--security, development and politics--the current tendency is to emphasise security primarily, development secondarily, and the political only marginally when addressing the impact of hma on peace building. Several examples indicate that mine action may have a significant impact on the political aspects of peace building, including confidence building, conflict resolution and reconciliation. At the same time, linking mine action to peace building creates certain dilemmas, and a rigid subordination of mine action initiatives to a centrally directed peace building strategy is unlikely to be productive. Ultimately, a focus on the peace building role of mine action carries a dual promise for the sector: it documents impacts that are currently unacknowledged, while encouraging new and refined practices.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1080/0143659032000132867
Affiliations: 1: Kristian Berg Harpviken and Bernt A Ska˚ra are at the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, Fuglehauggata 11, NO-0260 Oslo, Norway. kristian@prio.no; bernt@prio.no.
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help