Skip to main content

Margins of Error

Buy Article:

$47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

In the 1920s, the term ‘factography’ was coined by Russian revolutionary artists and theorists (such as Tret'iakov, Chuzhak, Brik and Vertov). This was a utopian dream, pursued by very talented and idealistic people, who failed to understand that there should have been two kinds of factography – positive and negative, affirmative and non-affirmative: a factography of de jure legitimate actions (promulgated by the State) and a factography of ‘illegal legitimacies’ that challenge the status quo. A paradigm shift discussed in ‘Margins of Error’ is Moscow conceptualism. In the 1970s and 1980s, unable to compete with the mass media and societal spectacles, these artists created their own ‘low-tech’ factographic discourse, aimed at registering their performances and other manifestations of ‘cultural insurgency’ that took place in parks and forests beyond the city. This brings to mind Carl Schmitt's theory of the partisan, especially when one can extend this political category to aesthetic practices.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Brik; Carl Schmitt; Chuzhak; Moscow conceptualism; Russian revolutionary artists; Tret'iakov; Tupitsyn; Vertov; cultural insurgency; factography; partisan

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2011-05-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more