Author: Benwell, Richard

Source: The Round Table, Volume 100, Number 413, April 2011 , pp. 199-211(13)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract:

Climate change presents a useful case in the study of small states because their interests can be differentiated from larger states. Small states are expected to respond to international politics, not to lead. The development of the climate regime has seen small states engage in a 'grand strategy' to achieve climate change mitigation. The apparent powerlessness of small states and the nature of the public good problem are central to understanding small states' negotiating power in the climate regime. They have capitalised on their victim status and the common interests of all states to act as regime leaders; but they have not achieved all of their objectives in terms of access to finance and technology. This suggests that while small states share the difficulties of other developing states in pursuing value-claiming goals, they may have a comparative advantage as norm-entrepreneurs.

Keywords: small states; climate change; Commonwealth; islands; Alliance of Small Island Developing States; Kyoto Protocol; nationally appropriate mitigation actions; low-lying states; Bali Action Plan; Marrakesh Accords; Framework Convention on Climate Change

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2011.565632

Affiliations: 1: Fitzwilliam College, University of Cambridge, UK

Publication date: 2011-04-01

More about this publication?

• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Political Science
• By this author: Benwell, Richard

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers