Authors: Andrews, Kristin; Radenovic, Ljiljana
Source: Philosophical Psychology, Volume 19, Number 5, October 2006 , pp. 663-678(16)
Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group
Abstract:
We clarify some points previously made by Andrews, and defend the claim that Davidson's account of belief can be and is challenged by the existence of some people with autism. We argue that both Bouma and Andrews (Philosophical Psychology, 15) blurred the subtle distinctions between the psychological concepts of theory of mind and joint attention and the Davidsonian concepts of interpretation and triangulation. And we accept that appeal to control group studies is not the appropriate place to look for an individual who can speak but who has significant problems with interpretation. In this paper we argue that by turning to the clinical literature we can more readily find such a challenge to Davidson's account.Keywords: Autism; Belief; Donald Davidson; Interpretation; Joint Attention; Theory Of Mind; Triangulation
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1080/09515080600904404
Links for this article