Author: Wager, Adam
Source: Philosophical Psychology, Volume 14, Number 3, 1 September 2001 , pp. 347-351(5)
Abstract:Gray argues that my three earlier counterexamples fail to refute representational theories of phenomenal character. I maintain that, despite Gray's arguments, each example does in fact work against the particular representational theory at which it is targeted. Further, I question whether my internalism regarding phenomenal character and Gray's externalism regarding modularity are in genuine conflict with one another.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: September 1, 2001