What kind of landscape do we want? past, present and future perspectives

Authors: Moore-Colyer, R.1; Scott, Alister2

Source: Landscape Research, Volume 30, Number 4, October 2005 , pp. 501-523(23)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Throughout much of the 20th century the public have played only a minor role in the determination of the scope and pattern of landscape change. In the earlier part of the century, professionals and arbiters of taste viewed the public as being incapable of appreciating rural or urban landscape aesthetics. For that powerful élite the rural landscape was seen as possessing indefinable ‘spiritual' qualities which demanded protection from undesirable urban influences. While the productivity of the countryside was largely ignored in the years of abundant supplies of cheap overseas food before World War II, the mythical idyll of the rural landscape with its allegedly timeless values and its sense of social order was defended by the professional élites who claimed substantial cultural authority. These viewpoints are documented and then it is considered how the democratization and reconceptualization of landscape have influenced lay landscape aesthetics, attitudes and policy. Drawing on recent evidence from the Welsh LANDMAP initiative, today's public is concerned with many of the issues which engaged the attention of the élite three generations ago. Although the discourse might be the same, its contestation is radically different, being set within a new agenda of inclusivity and involvement. The public today care passionately about their local landscapes and resent the current scale and pace of change, homogenizing development and destroying sense of place. If the wider agenda of sustainability is effectively to be addressed, it is crucial that those in authority engage more proactively with the public regarding landscape planning matters as the historical and contemporary top-down models need more sensitive realignment and synergy with deliberative and inclusionary approaches.

Keywords: Landscape; history; public perception; focus groups

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1080/01426390500273254

Affiliations: 1: Department of History, University of Wales Aberystwyth, UK 2: Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, UK

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.49 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A