Skip to main content

Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science

Buy Article:

$51.63 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This paper discusses the tenets of the politics of postmodern philosophy of science. At issue are Rouse's version of naturalism and his reading of Quine's distinction between the indeterminacy of translation and the underdetermination of theories by empirical evidence. I argue that the postmodern approach to science's research practices as patterns of interaction within the world is not in line with the naturalistic account Rouse aims at. I focus also on Rouse's readings of Heidegger's existential conception of science and Kuhn's concept of normal science. Finally, a strategy of defending science's cognitive distinctiveness in terms of hermeneutic philosophy is suggested as an alternative to the postmodern philosophy of science.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698590500249522

Affiliations: Hermeneutic Philosophy and Cultural Science at the St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, Bulgaria

Publication date: July 1, 2005

More about this publication?
routledg/cisp/2005/00000019/00000002/art00006
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more