EU Water Framework Directive vs. Integrated Water Resources Management: The Seven Mismatches

Authors: MUHAMMAD MIZANUR RAHAMAN; OLLI VARIS; TOMMI KAJANDER

Source: International Journal of Water Resources Development, Volume 20, Number 4, 2004 , pp. 565-575(11)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to analyze how the EU Water Framework Directive complies with the international principles concerning Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) agreed in major conferences. The outcomes of the International Conference on Water and Environment (Dublin, 1992), the Second World Water Forum (The Hague, 2000), the International Conference on Freshwater (Bonn, 2001), and the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) (Johannesburg, 2002) were compared with the EU Water Framework Directive. Seven notable mismatches were found, even though several EU countries have played a leading role in those conferences. The question arises whether the outcome of these conferences is not efficient enough to influence EU policies--do the conferences just produce collections of idealistic buzzwords or is there a requirement for different principles regarding IWRM for developing countries and developed countries?

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07900620412331319199

Affiliations: 1: Water Resources Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Finland

Publication date: 2004-01-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page