The Importance of Sectoral Differences in the Application of Complementary HRM Practices for Innovation Performance

Author: Laursen K.

Source: International Journal of the Economics of Business, Volume 9, Number 1, 1 February 2002 , pp. 139-156(18)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Recent theoretical and empirical analysis in the field of economic organization has focused almost exclusively on identifying organizational practices and complementarities between such practices, without regard for the type of activity in question. However, organizational theory suggests that more knowledge-intensive production activities often involve higher degrees of strategic uncertainty for firms and performance ambiguity in relation to individual employees. Therefore, the "organic" or "clan" form of organization - involving the application of "new" HRM practices - is expected to perform better within knowledge-intensive sectors of the economy, as compared to other sectors. A sample of 726 Danish firms with more than 50 employees in manufacturing and private services is studied. The results show that HRM practices are more effective in influencing innovation performance when applied together, as compared with situations in which individual practices are applied alone. In other words, organizational complementarities obtain. Moreover, the application of complementary HRM practices is more effective for firms in knowledge-intensive industries ("high" and "medium" knowledge-intensive industries).

Keywords: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; ORGANISATIONAL COMPLEMENTARITIES; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2002-02-01

More about this publication?