@article {Bensted:2012:1360-0834:237,
title = "Hi terrorist financing and the Internet: dot com danger",
journal = "Information & Communications Technology Law",
parent_itemid = "infobike://routledg/cict",
publishercode ="routledg",
year = "2012",
volume = "21",
number = "3",
publication date ="2012-10-01T00:00:00",
pages = "237-256",
itemtype = "ARTICLE",
issn = "1360-0834",
eissn = "1469-8404",
url = "https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/cict/2012/00000021/00000003/art00005",
doi = "doi:10.1080/13600834.2012.744222",
keyword = "the Internet, terrorist financing, the United Kingdom and cybercrime, the United States of America",
author = "Bensted, Georgina",
abstract = "This article provides both an overview and a critique of international counter-terrorist financing measures since 11 September 2001 and their application to tracking terrorist finances generated and channelled via the Internet. Three separate jurisdictions will be studied and compared:
the United States, the United Kingdom and the United Nations. In particular, the author examines the effectiveness and appropriateness of certain pieces of international guidance and national counter-terrorist financing legislation, as well as their application and interpretation by governments,
courts and law enforcement authorities. By assessing the three main ways of generating terrorist finances via the Internet direct solicitation of donations, using legitimate sources as a front and cybercrime the author aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each
jurisdiction.",
}