Poverty in South Africa: statistical inference for decomposable poverty measures

Authors: Ngwane A.K.; Yadavalli V.S.S.; Steffens F.E.

Source: Development Southern Africa, Volume 20, Number 2, June 2003 , pp. 283-291(9)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$36.48 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More about this publication?
More like this?
Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial

Abstract:

The measurement of poverty involves two problems: identifying the poor and constructing an index to measure the intensity of poverty. The headcount ratio is one of the widely used indices for the measurement of poverty. This article considers some of the other decomposable (i.e. additively separable) poverty measures. The importance of this property (decomposability) and of subgroup consistency for a poverty measure is highlighted. Since most of these poverty measures are estimated on the basis of sample surveys, the statistical significance of the observed differences is tested using the distribution-free approach proposed by Kakwani (1993, Review of Economics and Statistics, 75: 632-40). The Income and Expenditure Survey conducted in 1995 by Statistics South Africa, then called Central Statistical Service, is used in the study.

Document Type: Research article

Back to top

Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in
Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A