Managing ethno-national conflict: towards an analytical framework

$53.17 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

The management of ethno-national conflict remains an important issue on the security agendas of states and international organisations alike, from the Western Balkans to the Middle East and Asia Pacific, from sub-Saharan Africa to Central Asia and the Far East. The practical need to manage ethno-national conflict has also resulted in thorough academic engagement with the subject, which has generated a range of different theories of conflict management. This contribution will provide an overview of the current debate and examine the differences and similarities between three different theories - liberal consociationalism, centripetalism, and power-dividing. Based on this examination, an analytical framework is developed to identify the conditions under which ethno-national conflict management can succeed in providing settlements in the framework of which sustainable peace is attainable.

Keywords: centripetalism; conflict management; consociation; ethno-national conflict; power-dividing; power-sharing; territorial self-governance

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2011.564471

Affiliations: Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Publication date: April 1, 2011

Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more