The strategic choice of multiethnic parties in Zambia's dominant and personalist party system

Author: Scarritt, James R.1

Source: Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, Volume 44, Number 2, July 2006 , pp. 234-256(23)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

<p>In Zambia, ethnopolitical mobilisation is ubiquitous in competitive electoral politics. Mobilisation history, focused on national leadership and guided by the nationalist and power- and status-seeking values of political leaders, has interacted with ethnopolitical group morphology and presidential and plurality institutions to structure political actors' strategic choices to favour broad multiethnic parties. This militates against the emergence and undermines the sustainability of ethnic parties that rely overwhelmingly on one group for support. The political downfall of the one leader who assembled an initially successful minimum winning coalition reinforced these factors in encouraging parties to seek more inclusive multiethnic support.</p>

Keywords: Strategic choice; mobilisation history; institutions; values; multiethnic parties

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1080/14662040600831669

Affiliations: 1: Department of Political Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.34 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A